Showing posts with label gmo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gmo. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

GM Crops Farmer to Farmer

 The following is from the website "GM Crops - Farmer to Farmer" at http://gmcropsfarmertofarmer.com/

 

Welcome to GM Crops - Farmer to Farmer

Micheal Hart during the filming of GM Crops Farmer to Farmer
Michael Hart on the right with a farmer from Missouri
Michael Hart, a conventional livestock family farmer, has been farming in Cornwall for nearly thirty years and has actively campaigned on behalf of family farmers for over fifteen years, travelling extensively in Europe, India, Canada and the USA.
In this short documentary he investigates the reality of farming genetically modified crops in the USA ten years after their introduction. He travels across the US interviewing farmers and other specialists about their experiences of growing GM.
During the making of the film he heard problems of the ever increasing costs of seeds and chemicals to weeds becoming resistant to herbicides.
US farmers told him that a single pass (one herbicide application) is a fallacy and concurred that three or more passes are the norm for GM crops.
As weeds have become more resistant to glyphosate there has been a sharp increase in the use of herbicide tank mixes (most of them patented and owned by the biotech companies). Astonishingly some farmers were now having to resort to hand labour to remove weeds.
Farmers have seen the costs spiral, for example, the price of seed has gone from $40 to over $100 per acre over the last few years.
Farmers referred to co-existence (the ability to grow GM crops next to non-GM and organic crops) as “unsolvable” and say that it does not work.
In summary:
  1. A huge “weed” problem.
  2. The myth of co-existence.
  3. Farmers trapped into the genetically modified biotech system.
  4. Huge price increases for seeds and sprays- well beyond the price increases farmers have received for their crops.
In short, the film shows US farmers urging great caution to be exercised by UK and European farmers in adopting this technology.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Scientist Letter to USDA Secretary Vilsack Possibly a Fraud? No, not a fraud and now USDA admits to receiving it | Cooking Up a Story

Scientist Letter to USDA Secretary Vilsack Possibly a Fraud | Cooking Up a Story

Generally "Cooking up a Story" has good information. Unfortunately, a previous posting they made was based on a letter that appears to be a fraud.  Now, a bit over a week later, the USDA is now acknowledging that they did receive the letter from Dr. Huber.  Here is a link to an interview with Dr. Huber, explaining his research and his concerns.
 I am always reading whatever I can on GMOs in order to get to the truth of it all, and as complete an understanding as I can have. I have read Dr. Huber's papers before and as a critic of the herbicide Roundup, I was not surprised that the letter was from him.  He raises interesting points that the use of Roundup may alter mineral availability, the presence of fungii, and other alterations to the soil.  When you consider that Roundup is non specific in that it kills growing plants, the massive die-off would result in alterations to soil organisms.  This particular letter raises the possibility of a new fungus that has become a problem because of the use of Roundup.  Others who work in the field question Dr. Huber's claims because they have not been presented in an academic setting or in a peer reviewed journal, and their own research does not agree.  http://www.farmgateblog.com/article/glyphosate-are-you-using-it-or-are-you-scared-by-the-rumors
Here is my amended posting  :
http://thefarmersstand.blogspot.com/2011/02/leading-plant-scientist-sounds.html

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Article deleted as of Feb 25 because of fraudulent information - NEW INFO - Not fraudulent, USDA has letter: "Leading Plant Scientist Sounds Alarm—USDA GM Alfalfa Decision Under Possible Review | Cooking Up a Story"

Scientist Letter to USDA Secretary Vilsack Possibly a Fraud | Cooking Up a Story  Feb 25 - I deleted the "Cooking up a Story" article that indicated that a leading plant scientist was revealing new information about gmo's - because (as the link above discusses) the letter sent to the USDA seemed to be fraudulent, but now USDA admits to having letter and will respond to scientist directly.  Perhaps the whole thing is a HUGE misunderstanding, was never claimed to be fraudulent, ....I really don't know.   I know that the recent USDA GM Alfalfa decision has opponents of genetic engineering up in arms, but it is always disappointing to see it when opposing sides of the debate go to the extent of spreading lies and misinformation.  Or maybe someone just jumped to the wrong conclusion.  I have been following agricultural issues and trends for thirty years now, and read everything I can on GMOs and talk to scientists, farmers, policy makers to understand all points in the debate.  It's hard to get to the truth of the matter when misrepresentations are made, or suspicion is in the air .
    I had the good fortune to hear Canadian MP Alex Atamanenko speak at our BC Sheep Federation AGM this year, and talk to him personally about his efforts to address some issues concerning the introduction of GMO foods into the marketplace with his member's bill C-474 (recently defeated).  Some scientists see great potential for the technology, some see a host of undetermined consequences.  Same with farmers.
     At this time of year, I like to feed alfalfa to the ewes, along with some locally grown barley, our own grass hay, and whatever stockpiled grass we have.  Alfalfa is high in calcium, vitamin A, and protein.  The sheep love it, and the baby lambs nibble at the alfalfa leaves and it gives them a good start.  We can't easily grow alfalfa here - it likes a sandy soil, deep because of the deep roots, and a dry climate for the alfalfa to cure.  We could try, but it is one of the few inputs I buy for the farm.  The alfalfa that comes to our area is grown in the interior of BC, in Alberta, or in Washington State.  Sometimes when you buy from a feed store you might not be sure of the source, but it is generally from one of those three areas.

With the US decision to allow Roundup-Ready Alfalfa to be deregulated, thus allowing it to be grown anywhere in the US, we have to consider the impact on our farm and others in BC who use alfalfa.  Will the alfalfa from Washington be RR-Alfalfa? What do alfalfa producers in BC think?  I asked a friend who grows alfalfa in the interior what she thought.

She said "I don't know much about the GMO alfalfa, just that we haven't planted any of  it. 
We go out of our way to purchase very winter hardy and disease resistant varieties AND a selection of them so as not to have a monoculture. We also sow a good percentage of orchard grass with it. So far, we have only needed to seed all our fields once - reseeding needs to start now on our first field we seeded/ re did  in 2003.
I like the multi branching alfalfa's, they hold their softness longer if we have to wait for weather to cut. They don't go 'hard', they tend to just keep on growing with new young branches."
I downloaded the USDA decision document, but haven't slogged through it yet. I think that the decision was partly based on the use of Roundup  to establish a pure stand of alfalfa around the time of planting - the field will produce for several years without the need of Roundup before replanting is needed.  The Roundup would keep weeds down as the small plants became established.  
I also think that the decision was also based on the "Genie being let out of the bottle".  A legal paper I just read stated that some GM contaminants are now expected in non-GM products, so there would be a much more complicated issue as to who is to blame, in the case of contamination.  This has also been verified by several farm publications, and is a reasonable expectation of anything introduced to the environment that has the ability to persist for any length of time.  Organic foods can't use the claim "pesticide free", but they can say "pesticides not used", because of the long time use of pesticides, some of which have persisted and spread int he environment.
So far the biggest problem we have had with alfalfa is a star thistle contamination of some Washington alfalfa a few years ago, which irritated the sheep's mouths. 
Now I don't have to just think about where my food comes from, I have to think about where my sheep's food comes from - and what the long term consequences may be.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Excellent discussion on Genetic Engineering and agriculture by Pamela Ronald and Raoul Adamchak: The Food of the Future

FORA.tv - Pamela Ronald and Raoul Adamchak: The Food of the Future 
(click on the link for the seminar and discussion)

Two revolutions - Genetic Engineering and Organic Farming are often seen in opposition, but this couple are a marriage of the two disciplines, and also married to each other.
This seminar is presented by both Pamela And Raoul, she is a plant scientist, and he is an organic farmer.  They are both at the University of California at Davis.
Worth listening to, if you are interested in the current debate around GMO foods.

The book, Tomorrow's Table, is a must read.  It is co-authored by Pamela and Raoul.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Agricultural Estimates 2009 - Lana Popham, NDP MLA, asks the Minister of Agriculture about GMO seed research being done in BC.

Agricultural Estimates 2009 -Lana Popham asks the Minister of Agriculture about GMO seed research being done in BC.

2009 Legislative Session: First Session, 39th Parliament
HANSARD


"Hon. S. Thomson: The $4 million that the member opposite is referring to…. These are staff resources in our research innovation policy development branch. This covers industry specialists who work around the province supporting the industry in development initiatives. This is our policy development branch within the ministry that helps work on strategic policy in support of the industry.

L. Popham: Is there a way that the agriculture community has of applying for some of this money for innovation and research?

Hon. S. Thomson: There are research dollars available to industry through Growing Forward and through the Investment Agriculture Foundation and through the B.C. Innovation Council, which the province has invested in — not within this specific vote that you're referring to here. That's what the industry specialists and staff resources do, and that is assist industry in working with them to support their research needs through those programs.
There are resources in all of those agencies and programs available for that purpose. If there were any specific interests that you had to bring forward, then we could certainly have our industry specialists work on looking at where the most appropriate place to direct those research needs would be.

L. Popham: I'm wondering: in the research side of it, is there research being done right now on genetically modified seeds for British Columbia?
Hon. S. Thomson: Not by the province of British Columbia.

L. Popham: Are there any companies that this money is supporting that are doing that research?

Hon. S. Thomson: Not to the best of our knowledge.

L. Popham: I think it's quite critical that as a province we take a stand on genetically modified seed. I'm wondering if the province would be going in that direction.

Hon. S. Thomson: We have not contemplated a specific policy on that at this point, but I would be pleased to meet with the member opposite to discuss it and to hear her views on it.

L. Popham: Thank you. That sounds like a great offer. I would love to do that.

I can't wait to get back to the Legislature to continue this discussion......." 

I guess this was before the non-browning GMO apple developed in BC was announced.

Potential Impacts of Bill C-474 - Dave Sippell - President of Canadian Seed Trades Association

Part 2 - Alex Atamanenko - Does Canada Need Bill C-474

Part 1 - Alex Atamanenko - Does Canada Need Bill C-474

Canada is debating Bill C 474 - Regarding GMO seeds and their affect on our markets

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Pamela Ronald and Raoul Adamchak: The Food of the Future

Pamela Ronald and Raoul Adamchak: The Food of the Future

This is a terrific book for anyone who wants to know more about genetically engineered crops - their potential, and their risks.  Pamela Ronald works in this field at UC Davis, specifically with rice, and her husband Raoul manages the organic farm at UC Davis. It is carefully and thoughtfully written.

Click on the link above and hear them speak on this topic and answer some equally thoughtful questions, as part of a series on ForaTV.